Advertisement

OPINION: Response to 'Parable of Paducah Politics'

OPINION: Response to 'Parable of Paducah Politics'
Advertisement
By John Williams, Jr., Citizen
Sep. 30, 2019 | PADUCAH
By John Williams, Jr., Citizen Sep. 30, 2019 | 05:39 PM | PADUCAH
In response to the recent editorial and comments last month at the Paducah City Commission, those confused by the diversity of our community need to consider the lessons before them before continuing the hate speech that they consider helpful and bold.  It is not helpful nor bold, rather, it is universally hurtful and offensive.
 
I don’t know a person who has not offended the Golden Rule by saying or doing something that hurts someone unlike themselves.  Further, I recognize myself in a continuing struggle to achieve the ideals that define us as Americans.  I know that measuring against those ideals and the Golden Rule is the right thing to do, despite our failing to do the right thing 100% of the time. Keeping to common rights, respect and rules for equal treatment is just not easy. 
 
Our City Commission and Mayor have not in any way whatsoever “unleashed a Pandora’s box of sexual anarchy” as accused.  What seems to be misunderstood is that people of all sexual orientations are not new creations any more than are people of all races, religions, all Christian denominations, socio-economic backgrounds or educational attainments are. And, there is nothing new in anyone’s desire to be a visible and welcomed part of the community.  To think the City Commission and Mayor have allowed something to “escape” that did not exist before is perversely ridiculous. 

I also find the self-righteousness a selective reading of any common moral code. 

The language and spirit of public temper tantrums being thrown are not leadership from a faith or civic perspective.  They are “brazen outrages” and “troublesome politics,” which have repeatedly crossed the line.  I have no problem with the City adopting a guideline that those speaking during a public meeting of the Commission to be on-topic to the matters at hand.  That is not curtailing anyone’s freedom to express disapproval; it is a standard of keeping the conversation on what is being considered for our common benefit.

What is going on now is simply ugly bullying.  It must and should stop, and I am sad that it continues to find any forum to be heard.  It can only lead to more hate and more bullying.

Finally, I want to express my appreciation and respect for the City Commissioners for their decorum and especially for Mayor Harless for her grace in words and actions taken through this period.  We have witnessed aggressive character attacks, some in the name of Christianity, that would have had me very angry and arguing the civic and faith value of the assaults right then and there.  The Commission and the Mayor have not done this. 

By ordinance, behavior and example, our Commission and Mayor have chosen to treat all citizens with the same level of rights, respect and decency … even those who are confused to turn the topics into hate.  Those confused should mirror the model set by our Commission and Mayor.

Editor's Note: This opinion piece was written in response to another posted on this site a few days prior. A link to that column is included below in case someone needs to refer to it for proper context.


Views, opinions, positions or strategies expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions or strategies of West Kentucky Star.com, Bristol Broadcasting or any employee thereof. Bristol Broadcasting makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, correctness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.

Bristol Broadcasting reserves the right to delete, edit, or alter in any manner it sees fit comments that it, in its sole discretion, deems to be obscene, offensive, defamatory, threatening, in violation of trademark, copyright or other laws, or is otherwise unacceptable.



On the Net:

Previous Opinion Article
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT